

Dan Bice
|
Questions
on Thompson case won't quit
Sept. 12, 2007
The federal case
against Georgia Thompson is long dead, and she is back to work in her
state job.
But questions
about the feds' failed prosecution of Thompson just won't go away.
|
And with good reason.
Take a look at the recent release of a couple dozen documents by U.S.
Justice Department officials on the case. A jury convicted the state
civil servant on charges that she steered a contract to a company with
political ties to Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle. But in strong language,
the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals threw out that verdict, freeing
Thompson from prison.
The records show that Milwaukee U.S. Attorney Steve Biskupic made a key
error in describing the case when he informed his superiors in
Washington, D.C., that the conviction had been overturned.
"Georgia Thompson, a Wisconsin state official working in the Governor's
Office, was responsible for evaluating the awarding of a state travel
contract," states the memo from Biskupic on April 6.
But Thompson never worked in Doyle's office. She was not a Doyle
appointee. Rather, she was a civil servant who worked in the state
Department of Administration and was hired under Republican Gov. Scott
McCallum.
The mistake is repeated in an "urgent report" from Biskupic to
then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and then-Deputy Attorney General
Paul McNulty on April 26, a few days after the appeals court released
its written decision.
Were Biskupic and/or his staff fudging the facts for his bosses so
Thompson appeared closer to the second-term Democratic governor than
she actually was?
Not at all, Biskupic said this week.
"Obviously, we know she didn't work in the governor's office," he said.
"It was an erroneous drafting."
Even so, the new records show, the folks in D.C. were not impressed
with the case, particularly after it was tossed.
"Here's the 7th Circuit's Georgia Thompson opinion," writes Raymond
Hulser, a Justice Department official, in a May 3 e-mail to another
staffer. "It is not good news."
Replies Craig Donsanto, head of the agency's election crimes branch:
"Bad facts make bad law. How in heck did this case get brought?"
Good question, even if the pair was engaging in some Monday morning
quarterbacking. Perhaps more important, what was everyone saying before
and just after the charges were brought?
Justice officials declined to provide records showing any of that, and
House Judiciary Committee members sent out a follow-up letter Tuesday
accusing the agency of failing to fully comply with their records
request.
Brian Benczkowski, a ranking official in the U.S. attorney general's
office, did volunteer to have Biskupic provide the legislative panel
with an "untranscribed briefing" on the Thompson case.
In his interview this week, Biskupic took it a step further.
"If they want to hear from me, I'm happy to do it."
Even if the testimony is transcribed and under oath?
"It really doesn't matter to me."
|