An Interview with Bryan Purdie
WoodGrains owner
says
innocence was never in question
By Masaaki Harada,
Tribune staff writer
February 20, 2003
|
Bryan Purdie (r) talks with
friend
Doug Wiegel
|
After more than two years of
uncertainty, Bryan
Purdie questions why the criminal charges against him took so long to
develop,
and now that the case has been dismissed, hopes to regain a normal life
as
soon as possible.
"I knew that justice was going to be
served,"
he said. "The thing is, from day one, I have had all the facts. I have
had
the truth. And, I knew my innocence. I did not have to form any
hypothesis
about it."
Purdie, 32, had repeated in a series of
interviews with investigators that an extension cord - a piece of
evidence that eventually killed the charges - could have been the cause
of fire.
The female end of the 20-foot cord,
which he
purchased in the winter of 2000 to light up a grapevine deer Christmas
decoration, was somehow lost before it was examined by an expert,
though photographs taken
just before it was seized from the scene show the part was hanging from
the
ceiling.
"It should have been acknowledged,
digested.
And, an undetermined cause of the fire should have been announced at
that
time," Purdie said. "No charges should have ever been brought in this
case
in the first place."
While understanding what the
investigators
needed to do, Purdie believes they were preoccupied and biased by the
positive
reaction of a combustible gas detector at the fire scene, which does
not
necessarily prove the presence of accelerant.
Purdie said he put $46,000 in personal
resources into his legal defense.
His first attorney, Don Savelkoul,
withdrew
from the case when Purdie's budget dried up right before the original
trial
was to start last April. Purdie applied for a public defender but was
obliged to renounce his demand for a speedy trial.
Purdie questioned the fairness in the
court
fight when the prosecution was preparing to bring seven expert
witnesses
while he could plan only one with his limited resources.
"How do you get a fair trial, if you
can't
compete head-on with them? Even though we had all the facts, we had
truth
on our side, they kept spending money and spending. I think a part of
the
strategy of prosecutor was to delay this as long as possible."
The doors of WoodGrains
Furniture
have been shut since the day of fire. Purdie still doesn't know if he
will
be able to reopen the shop again.
His $240,000 insurance claim had been
denied
before the criminal case was filed, and the dismissal of the arson
charges
does not obligate the insurance company to pay. Purdie needs to go
through
a long and costly process in a civil court to get a settlement.
Purdie said he's come to realize that
"innocent
until proven guilty" is just a theory. In reality, society practices
"guilty
until proven innocent," he said.
Before finally got a full-time job about
a
year ago, Purdie had to get by with whatever odd jobs he could find
while
depending on support from his family and friends.
"You know who your friends are when you
are
accused," he said.
Many turned their backs on Purdie. "They
chose
to do that, and for whatever reasons, I can't do anything about that.
The
only thing I can do is I can take the feeling that I felt and make sure
that
I don't do that to someone else. If we each realize that the person is
innocent and treat them in that way," he said.
"My family's life, our very existence,
was
being challenged, for the lack of a better word," Purdie said. "The
only
thing I have to say is I hope this thing never, ever happens to anyone
here
again. I hope that we all learned from this experience."
|