
Judges carry 2 decades of misconduct, claims Munchinski
lawyer
By Richard Gazarik
TRIBUNE-REVIEW
Wednesday, October 8, 2008
An attorney for convicted killer David Munchinski has accused two
Fayette County judges of misconduct in murder trials when they were
prosecuting attorneys.
Citing a recent federal court decision involving another Fayette County
slaying, attorney Noah Geary accused judges Gerald Solomon and Ralph
Warman of "intentional, deliberate, egregious, patent and ongoing
misconduct" for two decades.
Geary made the charges in a filing Tuesday in U.S. District Court in
Pittsburgh in another attempt to free his 55-year-old client from what
Geary argues was a "wrongful conviction" in the 1977 murders of two men
in Bear Rocks.
He cited last week's ruling by a federal judge in Pittsburgh that
overturned the conviction and death sentence of Mark Breakiron of
Hopwood, convicted of killing a Fayette County waitress in 1987 by
stabbing her and cutting her throat.
The conviction was overturned because Solomon and Warman withheld
evidence from defense attorneys that could have affected the jury's
deliberations as to Breakiron's degree of guilt. He was convicted of
first-degree murder and sentenced to death.
Judge Nora Barry Fischer ordered a new trial for Breakiron, 47, in the
murder of Saundra Marie Martin, 24. She called the evidence against him
"unworthy of confidence" because then-District Attorney Solomon
withheld evidence from the defense.
Geary cited two other 1982 murder cases in which two first-degree
convictions were reversed and new trials granted because of alleged
misconduct by Warman and Solomon.
"Rather than being embarrassed by the two very recent reversals,
prosecutors Solomon and Warman commenced to engage in even more
outrageous misconduct in this case, showing their complete contempt for
the law, and for the rights of the accused," Geary wrote.
"The Commonwealth's response? Not a word," he said.
Senior Deputy Attorney General Christopher Carusone said Geary
"misconstrued" the state's arguments in the Munchinski case. He said he
will answer Geary's accusations in a court filing.
Solomon and Warman did not respond to requests for comment yesterday.
Geary has charged that Solomon and Warman withheld and tampered with
evidence in the prosecution of Munchinski, who was convicted in 1983 of
the murders of James Alford and Peter Gierke.
He said they removed portions of witness statements from police reports
before they were turned over to defense attorneys in Munchinski's
trial. They also allegedly withheld evidence that indicated the only
eyewitness to the murders was not even in Pennsylvania at the time.
A judge in 2004 ruled that Solomon and Warman had withheld evidence
from Munchinski's defense attorneys, which could have resulted in his
acquittal if it had been disclosed at the time.
In his latest filing, Geary contended Munchinski's case "reveals just
not extraordinary prosecutorial misconduct but criminal conduct."
Last fall, Geary filed a motion calling for the immediate release of
Munchinski, who has been serving consecutive life terms for the
slayings.
Geary has been waging a lengthy, relentless legal battle to free
Munchinski in a series of appeals in state and federal courts.
He sued Solomon, Warman and other county officials, but that case was
dismissed. He appealed that decision, but in February the U.S. 3rd
Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal.
Richard Gazarik can be reached at rgazarik@tribweb.com or 724-830-6292.
|