
BRIAN DICKERSON: Conviction in sex case doesn't
pass smell test
BY BRIAN DICKERSON
FREE PRESS COLUMNIST
November 1, 2006
No one can say for certain whether 12 Oakland County jurors got it
wrong last month when they convicted 32-year-old James Perry of
sexually assaulting two young boys at the Oak Park elementary school
where he taught kindergarten until October 2005.
But new evidence reported in today's Free Press suggests that the
alleged attack simply could not have taken place the way prosecutors
told jurors it did -- and that should compel Oakland County Circuit
Judge Denise Langford Morris to set aside the jury's guilty verdict in
a post-trial hearing this morning.
Even before his Sept. 20 conviction, James Perry was not a
prepossessing figure; friends concede a vague resemblance to John Mark
Carr, the delusional pervert who falsely claimed credit for JonBenet
Ramsey's murder.
But looking creepy isn't a crime. Neither is possessing videotapes of
Harry Potter and "The Lion King," which Oakland County Assistant
Prosecutor Andrea Dean described as "non-erotic pornography" after a
police search of Perry's house failed to turn up anything more damning.
Dean's case rested on the conflicting, ever-changing accounts of two
kindergartners who identified Perry as their attacker. Oak Park
Detective Erik Dolan told jurors that Perry yanked the boys out of a
lunch line and attacked them inside an empty special education
classroom.
But the teacher assigned to the classroom, who was never interviewed by
police, said the room was filled with children and adults when the
attack is supposed to have taken place, and two other staffers have
corroborated her testimony in sworn affidavits.
Sloppy police work, the absence of any physical evidence that the
assaults ever happened, and the disclosure that one victim's mother had
made similar allegations about her son's sexual victimization in
another city all raise grave doubts about Perry's guilt.
Oakland County Prosecutor David Gorcyca and Dean insist that the
exculpatory evidence reported in today's Free Press wouldn't have
altered the jury's guilty verdict. But it's telling that when
eyewitness accounts contradicting the prosecution's case surfaced,
Gorcyca's first reflex was to block reporters from discussing them with
the jurors who convicted Perry.
Jurors' names and addresses are a matter of public record. But the
prosecutor went to extraordinary lengths to keep them secret when the
Free Press filed a routine request for the information.
Judge Morris eventually ordered the names released. Gorcyca complied,
but only after warning jurors that reporters might be contacting them
with questions about the prosecution's case.
Morris will have to summon all her political courage to take the
extraordinary step of ordering a new trial. Her own federal court
ambitions, the publicity likely to arise from any intercession on
behalf of an unpopular defendant and the risk of political retaliation
by vindictive prosecutors all argue for passing the buck to appellate
court judges.
But justice requires that this slow-motion train wreck be brought to
halt now. And justice is all Judge Morris should concern herself with
this morning.
Contact BRIAN DICKERSON at 248-351-3697 or bdickerson@freepress.com
|