
Some of Humphrey's questionable cases
September 28, 2007
While he is praised for his hard work, Dane County Assistant District
Attorney Paul Humphrey has been the target of allegations of
dishonesty, overly aggressive tactics and faulty judgment. Here are
some of the cases in which Humphrey's actions have been questioned:
1992
Type of case: Animal neglect
What happened: Humphrey authorized seizure of horses, which were sold
to those pushing for prosecution
What the record shows: The Humane Society eventually paid a $97,500
settlement.
A 45-year-old Madison woman was charged with 16 misdemeanor counts for
allegedly neglecting her fiance's horses. Authorities seized the nine
racehorses which were later adopted by some of the officials involved
in the seizure, including the Humane Society officer, her friends and
the veterinarian who declared them neglected. Some of them resold the
horses at a profit. In 1996, the Humane Society agreed to pay retired
educator Hugh Porter $97,500 for the improperly handled seizure. Both
Porter and the woman — who pleaded no contest to avoid a lengthy prison
sentence — vigorously denied the horses were maltreated.
Humphrey defended the prosecution but now admits he should've kept
closer track of who got the horses.
Full story coming Wednesday.
1999
Type of case: Bail jumping
What happened: Humphrey allowed the wrong man to stay in jail for a
month.
What the record shows: Humphrey was notified several times of the
mistake.
Humphrey kept 18-year-old Kenneth Bell in the Dane County Jail for a
month, even though he was repeatedly notified by authorities that it
was Kenneth's brother, Aziel, who was sought on an arrest warrant.
Humphrey doesn't deny the wrong man may have been in jail but said any
mistakes he made were unintentional. "Just because I'm wrong, doesn't
mean I'm a crook," he said.
Full story coming Tuesday
2001
Case: Vehicular homicide
What happened: Humphrey is accused of withholding evidence and lying
about it.
What the record shows: Humphrey withheld crucial crash-scene photos and
made misleading statements about other evidence.
Seventeen-year-old Adam Raisbeck was charged with homicide by negligent
operation of a motor vehicle after he missed a curve near Marshall and
rolled his car. His friend, Jerry Pageloff, 33, died, and Andre Ross,
16, was injured. Humphrey alleged Raisbeck was driving nearly 89 miles
an hour. The speed supported Humphrey's charge of negligent homicide,
but documents and interviews indicate that Humphrey's own expert had
told him the speed estimate was too high.
After a more than 3 1/2-year prosecution, Raisbeck, who had no drugs or
alcohol in his system and who didn't remember the crash, was acquitted
in 2005. In the years leading up to the 2005 trial, judges who handled
the case and defense attorney Joseph Sommers repeatedly charged the
prosecutor made misleading statements and withheld evidence, including
crucial crash-scene photos that proved Raisbeck was going slower than
alleged. Judge Paul Higginbotham said Humphrey "played very fast and
loose, if not recklessly, with the true facts."
Humphrey has admitted he made mistakes during the prosecution. He also
acknowledged withholding a witness statement he should've turned over,
but he denied his other actions broke the rules. A hearing referee for
the state Supreme Court found Humphrey committed three acts of
misconduct. A decision on a possible reprimand or other penalty is
pending.
2001
Case: Contempt of court
What happened: Humphrey charged two potential witnesses for failing to
appear for a trial.
What the record shows: The trial wasn't held.
Humphrey charged Monica Williams, 26, and Armando Ruiz, 25, with
contempt of court for not showing up as witnesses for a trial that
wasn't held. The morning of the July 19, 2001 trial, their friend,
defendant James Frutiger, told them he'd reached a deal with Humphrey
and they didn't need to testify. Two weeks later, Humphrey charged the
two with misdemeanor contempt of court. Ruiz pleaded guilty as part of
a deal involving other criminal charges, but Williams' case dragged on
for four years. The State Journal found Humphrey kept the case alive
for two years after District Attorney Brian Blanchard ordered him to
drop it. The case finally was dismissed in 2005.
Humphrey defended the prosecution, saying he thought the two witnesses
skipped out and had not been notified by the court of the cancelled
trial.
2002
Case: Animal abuse
What happened: Humphrey charged hatchery worker for killing cat.
What the record shows: State law allows hatchery managers to kill
animals that threaten or harass the fish.
A Department of Natural Resources worker was charged with animal
cruelty for killing a feral cat that had bitten him and had been
harassing the fish at the Nevin Fish Hatchery in Fitchburg. Humphrey
pursued the case even though Wisconsin law specifically allows hatchery
managers to kill animals that threaten fish. After a public outcry,
Humphrey dismissed the case.
2003
Case: Vehicular homicide
What happened: Humphrey accused defendant of speeding before fatal
crash. After seven months in jail, the defendant pleaded guilty.
What the record shows: Police had informed Humphrey of tests indicating
she was driving under the speed limit.
Maria Ledezma Martinez, 24, accidentally ran down and killed a German
tourist crossing the street near the Capitol. At her preliminary
hearing, Humphrey charged Ledezma Martinez was speeding at 30 miles an
hour when she hit Greta Merz. But days before the hearing, police
videotaped a reenactment indicating Ledezma Martinez could have been
driving no faster than 20 miles an hour — under the speed limit. For
months, Humphrey denied the videos existed and contended the
measurements of the crash scene had been thrown away. The defense
attorney in the case said Humphrey turned over most of the evidence
only after his client agreed to plead guilty. She spent about nine
months in the Dane County Jail and was deported to Mexico.
Humphrey and his supervisor, Deputy District Attorney Judy Schwaemle,
strongly defended the prosecution, insisting Ledezma Martinez was
negligent and Humphrey had no obligation to reveal the lower speed
estimate in the early stages of the case. Humphrey also said he was
unaware that the measurements had been misplaced in a police locker.
Blanchard said it would be important to know when Humphrey was notified
of the slower speed. Humphrey said he doesn't remember. The Office of
Lawyer Regulation is investigating.
Case: Bail jumping
What happened: Humphrey charged woman for being late for court hearing.
What the record shows: She hadn't been officially notified of the time.
Humphrey charged a 22-year-old woman with a felony for arriving one
hour late for a hearing that Humphrey knew she hadn't been notified she
had to attend. Schwaemle and Humphrey have both acknowledged the
prosecution was a mistake. The charge was dismissed.
Case: Arrest warrant
What happened: Humphrey sought arrest of possible witness for missing
trial date.
What the record shows: Trial had been postponed.
Humphrey swore out a warrant against a witness in the Raisbeck case,
18-year-old Kevin McCoy, for not showing up for Raisbeck's trial, even
though the trial had been postponed. Dane County District Attorney
Brian Blanchard later privately reprimanded Humphrey for having McCoy
arrested and for withholding a statement McCoy had made to police.
Blanchard removed Humphrey from the Raisbeck case in early 2004, citing
those actions as "abuses of your authority."
Humphrey said McCoy was reluctant to testify against Raisbeck and he
assumed he had skipped out when he didn't show up for the October 2003
trial.
2005
Case: Disorderly conduct
What happened: Humphrey was ordered to comply with rules on disclosing
evidence to the defense.
What the record shows: He didn't comply.
Judge Diane Nicks dismissed a misdemeanor case against a 17-year-old
Black Earth teen-ager after she found that Humphrey had made
"misleading statements" to defense attorney Paul F.X. Schwartz that he
was ready to go to trial. On the morning of the jury draw, Humphrey
admitted he wasn't prepared. Humphrey also failed to turn over to the
defense information on how to contact the victim, even after Nicks had
ordered him to do it. She granted Schwartz's motion to drop the case,
telling Humphrey his actions in the case were "egregious."
2007
Case: Failure to pay child support
What happened: Humphrey charged a man who had skipped child support
payments
What the record shows: The man was bankrupt, in part because of another
child's medical expenses. He was current in his payments when convicted.
Humphrey charged a Chicago father with seven felony counts for failing
to pay $2,846 in child support for his 17-year-old daughter. Defense
attorney Mark Frank said Anthony Williams, 36, fell behind during "two
bad years" when his wife left him and he declared bankruptcy in the
face of mounting medical bills from his stepdaughter's back surgery.
The mother and girl herself pleaded for leniency for Williams, who had
caught up to his payments during the prosecution. Humphrey refused to
consider anything less than a felony, Frank said, and a jury convicted
Williams on all seven counts.
Dane County Circuit Judge James Martin blasted Humphrey and sentenced
Williams to a few months of probation and a token fine. "This was a
prosecution solely because you could," Martin railed at Humphrey. "It
took no prosecutorial discretion. It took no thought at all. It was
simply, 'I can go after them, I can get them, and I'm going to do it,
and in the process I'm really going to damage him...He's paid in full.
He's done everything that he's been asked to do. The only thing that
you've done is scar him for life."
During sentencing, Humphrey argued that "This was a case where the
system actually did work," adding that the prosecution forced Williams
to "take responsibility financially for his child."
|