
Judge, citing doubts in case, orders new
trial for Weichel
By Jonathan Saltzman, Globe Staff |
October 27, 2004
Twenty-three years after he was convicted of murdering a
Braintree
man in an ambush, Frederick Weichel has won a new trial because of
newly discovered evidence and allegations that the case was tainted by
James "Whitey" Bulger and the fugitive mobster's associates.
Superior Court Judge Isaac Borenstein ruled Monday that a
letter
received by Weichel's mother seven months after a Norfolk County jury
convicted Weichel in 1981 and comments made by the letter's purported
author raise doubts about his conviction.
In the letter and statements, Weichel's one-time friend,
Thomas
Barrett, said that he, not Weichel, shot and killed Robert LaMonica
near the victim's apartment building shortly after midnight May 19,
1980. Borenstein accepted the letter and comments as credible, but
prosecutors dispute them. In a brief court appearance last year,
Barrett refused to admit he wrote the letter, citing his Fifth
Amendment right against self-incrimination.
"Both Barrett's written and oral confessions cast real doubt
on the
justice of Weichel's conviction, especially since the conviction was
not based on overwhelming evidence of guilt," the judge wrote in a
decision received yesterday by Weichel's lawyers. "Since Weichel did
not have the opportunity to present this exculpatory evidence to the
jury, he is entitled to that opportunity now."
Weichel's lawyers applauded the 24-page ruling yesterday and
planned
to ask the judge as soon as possible to release him from MCI-Shirley.
Borenstein has not scheduled a new trial. "We are thrilled," said
attorney Jeffrey A. Denner. "What happened to Fred Weichel is
unspeakable and part of a larger conspiracy that the Bulger group and
the FBI were involved in."
The Norfolk district attorney's office, which prosecuted
Weichel,
issued a statement saying that the ruling contained "significant errors
of fact and law" and that prosecutors intended to appeal to the state
Supreme Judicial Court.
Prosecutors believe "the judge was plainly wrong" to accept
Barrett's purported confessions as "sufficiently corroborated," the
statement said.
Weichel's late mother, Gloria Weichel, received a letter in
March
1982. In the letter, Barrett said he killed LaMonica and that he was
sorry that Weichel was wrongly imprisoned for the murder, Weichel's
lawyers contended in a hearing last year.
At the hearing, Weichel's lawyers presented evidence that the
letter
did not surface for years because Weichel and his mother feared
reprisals from Bulger. Weichel testified that Bulger and Stephen "The
Rifleman" Flemmi approached him four times before his arrest for the
murder and once afterward, when he was free awaiting trial, and
threatened to harm him or his family if he ever mentioned Barrett's
name.
A witness also testified that Gloria Weichel, who died in
2001, told
her sister that after she received the letter, two men whom she did not
know came to her door and asked her for it. She refused to turn it
over, but later entrusted it to a lawyer.
"In this case, the effects of Bulger's threats, the undisputed
and
widely known reputation earned by Whitey Bulger, reasonably and readily
prevented Weichel from learning about and making use of the exculpatory
evidence contained in Barrett's letter," Borenstein wrote in his
ruling. "Bulger's iron grip on the South Boston community in the 1970s
and 1980s is without doubt."
The other newly discovered evidence concerns comments Barrett
supposedly made about committing the murder to a mutual friend of
Weichel's, Sherri Robb, a social worker from California. Robb testified
last year that Barrett told her many times that he "wanted to kill
himself because someone was taking the rap for something that he did."
Robb said she eventually realized he was referring to Weichel.
|