
State worker seeks apology after porn charges
dismissed
By Laurel J. Sweet | Tuesday, June 17,
2008

Michael and Robin
Fiola
|
The lawyer for a
former state employee against whom child
pornography charges were dropped after it was determined that a virus
on his work laptop likely caused the illegal downloads wants the the
state inspector general to investigate the case.
But first, Timothy Bradl, a partner in the law firm Denner Pellegrino,
wants the Department of Industrial Accidents to apologize to its former
employee, Michael Fiola, and his wife, Robin.
“They have destroyed this man’s life,” Bradl said yesterday after the
Herald reported that the Suffolk District Attorney’s Office - based on
the findings of computer forensic analysts that Fiola, 53, was more
likely a victim of Internet spammers - dropped its prosecution of the
ostracized workers’ compensation investigator.
“We have managed to expose the allegations
as a fraud and DIA at
this point only has one course of action,” Bradl said. “That is to step
up, do the right thing and apologize to this man and his wife.”
|
Fiola is appealing his termination but doesn’t want his
job back.
DIA spokeswoman Linnea Walsh said yesterday, “We are not privy to the
details of the criminal investigation of the district attorney’s office
or attorney general’s office. However, those offices are charged with
determining whether to bring criminal charges and not with determining
whether there was a proper basis to discharge Mr. Fiola from his
position with the DIA.”
Fiola was fired last year after the department found his laptop was
filled with porn, which Fiola insisted he was unaware had been
downloading into an internal file for months.
“No one cared to listen. No one cared what happened to us,” said Robin
Fiola, recalling the hours she spent crying with her husband. “I was
afraid it was going to kill one of us before the case was dismissed.”
Opinion Letter:
A couple crucified
By Eric S. Atwater | Wednesday, June 18, 2008
I feel compelled to support Michael and Robin Fiola for their having to
live in hell the past several years (June 16).
Their so-called friends who ran when the allegations came out were not
friends. I would kiss them off. They didn’t even give their “friend”
the benefit of the doubt.
There needs to be a law against such public hangings before a complete,
competent and secure investigation is done. Too many lives are ruined
due to false allegations and speculation. Authorities have no right to
publicly prosecute anyone, possibly ruining a reputation for life,
without first conducting a proper, thorough investigation.
I wish the Fiolas the best in rebuilding their tarnished reputations.
Eric S. Atwater, Wakefield
|