
Dallas man freed after 14 years for sexual assault
November 4, 2011
DALLAS, TX -- A Dallas man who spent 14 years in prison for doggedly
refusing to admit he sexually assaulted his stepdaughter was set free
Friday in a case that had been unraveling since the victim recanted and
former prosecutors were accused of withholding evidence.
State District Judge Susan Hawk told Dale Lincoln Duke, 60, it was a
"privilege" to release him, triggering applause and a standing ovation
in a courtroom that included his parents.
"This is overwhelming," said Duke's 87-year-old father, George.
Hawk agreed with current Dallas County District Attorney Craig Watkins
that Duke did not sexually assault the 7-year-old girl in 1992. In the
intervening years, the victim has recanted her story, and Duke's
attorney, Robert Udashen, earlier this year found that prosecutors in
the 1990s had withheld evidence that cast doubt on the girl's
credibility.
Duke had entered a no contest plea to the charge and received 10 years'
deferred adjudication. But he was later kicked out of a counseling
program for refusing to admit he committed the offense, so he was
sentenced to 20 years in prison.
Asked after Friday's hearing why he refused to admit to the crime in
the face of prison time, Duke said his faith in God precluded him from
doing so.
"It says in The Word not to bear false witness," he said. "I had to do
something I could live with."
The freed man, surrounded by family and friends, said he has no
definite plans.
"I'm going to take it easy, relax a little bit, get back into society
and see how things go," Duke said.
Under Watkins, the county has worked diligently to overturn false
convictions, but Duke's case is a rarity in that it didn't hinge on
DNA. Since 2001, 22 people have been exonerated in the county through
DNA testing, a record unmatched nationally.
Udashen said the key to determining Duke's innocence was the discovery
by Watkins' office in March of notes indicating that the victim's
maternal grandmother thought the girl was lying.
By not turning over exculpatory evidence, the prosecutors who dealt
with Duke's case in the 1990s engaged in prosecutorial misconduct,
Udashen said. Those prosecutors are now deceased, as is the
grandmother, the attorney said.
Watkins said the reversal of Duke's conviction represents how sometimes
prosecutors are "more concerned with getting a conviction than doing
what's right."
Watkins said the success of the DNA outcomes pursued by his office has
created the public confidence necessary to examine cases where science
is not the major factor.
"This case is a prime example of that," he said. "Thankfully, Mr. Duke
kept fighting, which gave us the ability to look at his case."
After the hearing, both Hawk and Watkins shook Duke's hand.
"I'm glad to have you back in society," Watkins told Duke.
"Me too," Duke responded.
|