Our instincts
are to protect and defend defenseless children. It is a measure
of a civilized society. It is equally instinctive to
presume guilt. That tendency is even stronger when the accused
must prove a negative---that what he or she is accused of didn't
happen---and the accuser is a physician with a stack of degrees or,
equally potent, a child. These combinations have led to
countless criminal convictions: parents, day care providers,
teachers, neighbors---even when the charges cannot be supported by
objective scientific evidence, or when there was no physical evidence
at all to
support the claims.
We're having
second looks at many of these cases, acknowledging that we've convicted
innocent people, destroyed families and ruined childhoods. A
second look at the processes that led to these miscarriages of justice
is essential, because unless we learn from our mistakes, we will
continue to repeat them.
Shaken Baby Syndrome
More
than 1,200 U.S. children are diagnosed with Shaken Baby Syndrome and
one in four of those children die from it. Dr.
Michael Laposata of Boston, MA believes in cases of
potential Shaken Baby Syndrome, the medical
community should perform a whole battery of blood tests rather than
performing the simplest or most common tests to be absolutely certain
of whether there's been child abuse. Too easy to play the
hero.
On
the Thursday before Labor Day, 2007, while Julianna Caplan of
Washington, DC was
changing the diaper on one of her twins, she heard a dull thud. She
turned around to see her other 8-month-old trying to push herself up
from the floor, where she'd been playing, and knock her head.
There were no bumps or bruises, but over the next few hours, the little
girl acted fussy, then altogether out of sorts. After she began
throwing up and drifting off to sleep, her parents grew concerned,
called the doctor and ended up at Children's Hospital. The
baby recovered fully within 24 hours, but Caplan and her husband,
Greg, remain trapped in the District's
frightening child-abuse system. Family Services Well
Done, or Overdone?
In the UK, new medical evidence could clear childminder
(babysitter) Keran Henderson,
who is serving a three-year prison sentence after being convicted of
shaking an 11-month-old girl to death. That new evidence comes
from this side of the Atlantic. Dr Chris Van Ee,
professor of biomechanics at Wayne State
University in Detroit, claims tests with crash dummies and corpses show
that falling off a sofa -- as the Caplan twin accidentally did -- does
far more damage than shaking. Conclusion: the
science behind shaken baby syndrome is flawed.
Veronica Martinez
Salcedo is a 38 year old nanny who was held in the Placer County,
CA jail since May, 2006 charged with the second degree murder of
16 month old Hannah Rose Juceam. Her first trial lasted six months and
ended in a mistrial due to a hung jury. While she waited to be retried,
the father of the deceased child waged a
widely advertised campaign in attempts to deny Mrs. Salcedo of her
rights to due process and presumption of innocence through
billboards and a purportedly educational website. After
another hung jury and mistrial -- with jurors voting 9 to 3 to acquit
-- prosecutors have decided not to try Veronica a third time.
|
The murder
case against Jeffrey Galford of Elkins, WV for the death of an infant
in his care has been dismissed. The child died in 2003.
State Medical Examiner Dr. James Frost conducted an autopsy and ruled
the death homicide as the result of shaken baby syndrome. The
report, however, was not sent to the prosecutor until 2006, and Galford
was indicted in 2007. In early 2008, just before trial was
scheduled to begin, Dr. Frost reviewed the child's full medical history
-- something he had made no effort to do before declaring the death a
homicide or in the years thereafter. The baby's complex medical
history led Dr. Frost to conclude no intentional act against the child
could be proven. Why
the 5-year wait to review the baby's medical history?
The Evidence for Shaken Baby
Syndrome
The
theory of shaken baby syndrome rests on core assumptions: shaking is
always intentional and violent; the injury an infant receives from
shaking is invariably severe; and subdural and retinal bleeding is the
result of criminal abuse, unless proved otherwise. Retinal
haemorrhage is one of the criteria used, and many doctors consider
retinal haemorrhage with specific characteristics pathognomonic of
shaking. However, in the March 27, 2004 issue of the British Medical
Journal, Patrick Lantz et al examine that premise and conclude
that it "cannot be supported by objective scientific evidence."
Read
the British Medical Journal
Case Report and Editorial (pdf files - use Adobe Acrobat Reader)
The National
Association of Medical Examiners (N.A.M.E.) Ad Hoc Committee on Shaken
Baby Syndrome published its Position
Paper on Fatal Abusive Head Injuries in Infants and Young Children in
the American Journal of Forensic Pathology and Medicine in 2001.
This Position Paper is repeatedly cited and relied on to prosecute
people because it states that SBS is an accepted diagnosis. The
Position Paper was rejected
on peer review for lack of scientific basis -- but published anyway,
since two of the authors were N.A.M.E. Board members.
Click HERE to
read the peer review rejection for yourself (pdf
file - use Adobe Acrobat Reader).
This is a publicly available document which was obtained from the Ken
Marsh (see below) case file.
In the UK, a
review of
nearly 300 cases in
which parents
were convicted of killing their young children has identified 28 where
there was "sufficient cause for concern to warrant further
consideration", the Attorney General, Lord Goldsmith, has told
Parliament. A further 89
cases of "shaken baby syndrome"
will be reconsidered in the light of a judgment from the Court of
Appeal expected in 2005, Lord Goldsmith promised. Three pending prosecutions have already been
abandoned "on the grounds that it was not safe to proceed". SBS: Dubious Diagnosis
Researchers
at the
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill were
taken aback at results of a radiology study looking into early brain
development. MRIs of normal, healthy infants found intracranial
bleeds in 26% of the babies. Intracranial
bleeding, which can cause serious brain damage or
even death, is one of the hallmark characteristics of Shaken Baby
Syndrome. Or
is it?
Dr. Patricia Moore, a
former Harris County associate medical examiner accused of
botching an autopsy that led to a young mother's imprisonment has come
under scrutiny in several other cases in which her conclusions were
later contested or revised. Moore attributed
infant deaths to
shaken baby syndrome at a rate considerably higher than the rate at
which it happens in the general population. Biased Autopsies
In
what experts say is the first such ruling in the nation, a
Greenup (Kentucky) Circuit Court judge has barred the prosecution from
introducing
expert testimony that a baby was injured by shaking, unless there is
other evidence of abuse. Issuing identical rulings in two cases,
Judge Lewis Nichols cited
biomechanical studies that have concluded it's impossible
for an adult to shake an infant hard enough to cause the injuries used
to diagnose the syndrome -- hemorrhaging behind both retinas and
hematomas, or pools of blood, in the membranes of the brain. Not Letting Doctors
Diagnose Legal Conclusions
Victims
of Faulty Diagnoses by Dr. Charles Smith
Toronto, Ontario (Canada)
In
Toronto, Ontario (Canada), errors were found in 20 of 45 autopsies,
dating back as far as 1991, performed by former provincial pathologist
Dr. Charles Smith. Twelve
of those cases resulted in criminal convictions and one in a
finding of not criminally responsible.
The first to be exonerated was William
Mullins-Johnson, who spent 12 years in prison for the rape and
murder of his niece. A 2005 review of Dr. Charles Smith's autopsy
and diagnosis found the the child had not been raped or strangled, but
choked to death on her own vomit caused by a chronic stomach ailment.
UPDATE:
10/15/07 - Mullins-Johnson
officially found innocent.
Sherry
Sherrett, one of
the 12, convicted of killing her own infant son, is seeking a full
public inquiry into Dr. Smith's work. The 2006 review shows her
son was not
murdered.
Louise
Reynolds spent 2 years in jail awaiting trial after Dr. Smith said
she stabbed her 7-year-old daughter, Sharon, to death with
scissors. Charges were dropped after it was demonstrated little
Sharon was mauled by a pit bull.
In 1998, Dr. Smith accused Louise and Marco
Trotta of suffocating their 4-month-old son, Paulo. Louise
served 5 years in prison; Marco was sentenced to 15 years, and had
served 9 years when the review indicated little Paulo suffocated on his
bedding.
CBC In Depth takes a closer look at Dr. Charles Smith: The Man Behind the
Public Inquiry
UPDATE: 2/9/08 - Dr. Smith
South of the Border. On
March 21, 2000, Christopher Fuller of Hamilton, Ohio told
police his daughter Randi, almost 3 years old, choked on a glass of
water and held her breath. But after a grueling interrogation
that was
not recorded, police claimed Fuller confessed to killing Randi when she
resisted his attempt to sexually assault her. He was charged with
capital murder, but the Hamilton authorities were apparently worried
about getting the death penalty, so they brought in Dr. Death, Dr.
Charles Smith of Ontario, Canada. Smith was already under
investigation for finding crimes where none existed in the deaths of
children. He came through for the Ohio boys. The jury not
only
convicted Fuller, they recommended death. Only Fuller's
previously
clean record saved him from execution, but he still languishes in
prison, for the rest of his life.
Dinesh Kumar
was told in 1992 by his lawyers that
the country's leading forensic pathologist - Charles Smith
- was going to testify against him at his trial for murder in the death
of his five-week-old baby, and that his chances of an
acquittal were minuscule. Although he knew he was innocent of
causing any harm to his son, Dinesh accepted an extraordinarily lenient
sentence -- 90 days in jail -- and pled guilty to criminal negligence
causing death. Now that Dr. Smith has been exposed as a quack,
Dinesh is seeking to restore his good name.
Link:
Harold Levy, author of The Charles
Smith Blog, tells us: I recently retired from the Toronto Star where I
have been reporting on Dr. Charles Randal Smith - a former pediatric
pathologist at the Hospital for Sick Children - for the past six years.
I intend, through this blog, to periodically report developments
relating to Dr. Smith in the context of the on-going public inquiry,
the on-going independent probe of cases he worked on between 1981 and
1991, and cases which have been launched, or will be launched in the
civil courts. I am currently researching a book on Dr. Smith and
would appreciate hearing from anyone who can provide me with useful
information.
|
Dr.
Daryl Steiner of Akron (Ohio) Children's Hospital has dedicated his
career to ferreting out cases of Shaken Baby Syndrome and leveling
abuse allegations against parents and caregivers -- 275 of them, so
far. "The ramifications of my diagnosis are huge," says Dr.
Steiner. Indeed, they are -- families torn apart, parents sent to
prison, to name a few. Everyone says Dr. Steiner is never
wrong. But he has been proven wrong twice recently. The fallibility of the
infallible doctor.
Saying
defense attorneys were ineffective, the Utah Supreme
Court ordered a new trial Tuesday for a man convicted of fatally
shaking his girlfriend's baby, who remained alive in a vegetative state
for 12 years. The
court's decision focused on brain images of the boy, Luther
Deem. A defense expert didn't see them until the morning of trial, and
a judge said that person was unqualified to interpret them. A fresh look at old evidence.
After
being accused of shaking a baby boy to death last October,
Cypress, CA neighborhood day-care operator Lorrie Mae Stoddard lost her
livelihood,
her standing in the community and many nights of sleep. Prosecutors
told a judge there was no evidence to back up the charges and the case
was dismissed.
Deputy Dist. Atty. Sonia Balleste said a recent, more in-depth
brain analysis showed that 4-month-old Noah Samuel Gusto of Cypress did
not die from being shaken and that he suffered two of three brain
hemorrhages before Stoddard ever came in contact with him at the
day-care center in her Cypress home. No shaking happened.
Less
than a month before Jamie and Ryan Page were to go on trial in
Oshkosh, WI for homicide in the death of an infant for whom they
provided day care, prosecutors have dismissed the charges. The
state continues to allege that the Pages caused the baby's death by
shaking him, but says it can't prove which of them did the
shaking. Perhaps medical testimony in Audrey Edmunds' case
(below) played a role. Charges Dropped.
Audrey
Edmunds, a former Waunakee, WI baby sitter imprisoned for nearly 10
years
after being convicted in the shaken-baby death of a 7- month-old girl,
is seeking a new trial, arguing that the scientific evidence used to
convict her is no longer valid. "Since Audrey Edmunds' trial . . . a
large body of new scientific
evidence has emerged that supports her claim of innocence," according
to a brief seeking a new trial for Edmunds filed by attorneys and law
students for the Wisconsin Innocence Project. "Classic" symptoms
not accurate.
UPDATE:
1/26/07 - In a two-day hearing, six physicians challenged the
medical
validity of the evidence that convicted Audrey Edmunds in 1996.
Among them was the forensic pathologist who testified against her at
trial. No
Confidence in SBS Diagnosis
UPDATE:
2/22/07 -
Audrey Edmunds says life would have crushed her by now, if not for her
faith in God -- and her belief that she will soon be reunited with her
daughters. The Human Toll of
Flawed Science
UPDATE:
2/23/07 - In
tense, combative testimony, a medical witness for the state
forcefully rejected recent studies that raise doubts about
shaken baby syndrome. The
combative testimony of Dr. Betty Spivack reflects the divide
among physicians in shaken-baby cases. One camp believes certain signs
and symptoms are proof of abuse, while the other side argues that such
indicators also can be seen in children who've been sick or had minor
accidents. Defending the
Conviction
UPDATE:
2/24/07- One of the physicians who cared for Natalie Beard at
University (now UW) Hospital in the final hours of her life testified
Friday he's certain that the 7-month-old was shaken to death and that
the injury occurred shortly before she came to the hospital. "She died
from inflicted traumatic brain injury -- that is, she was shaken," said
Dr. William Perloff, retired head of pediatric intensive care for the
hospital. "In her case, there was evidence of her head hitting a
surface."
But
That's More
Than Simply Shaking, Doctor ...
UPDATE: 3/29/07 - Dane
County Circuit Judge Daniel Moeser has denied Audrey Edmunds a new
trial. What
it came down to, Moeser said, was whether there was a
"reasonable probability" that a new jury, hearing the evidence
presented earlier this year and in 1996, would've reached a different
verdict. He determined it would not. Edmunds
supporter Michelle Urso of Waunakee said she believes
one thing is true: "There is no doubt in my mind that there is an
innocent woman sitting in jail. Not a single doubt." And the Innocent
Woman will Stay in Prison.
UPDATE:
1/24/08: Twelve
years after she was sent to prison on charges of shaking
a baby to death, a former Waunakee day-care provider should get a new
trial, a state appeals court has ruled. New
evidence in the case "shows that there has been a shift in
mainstream medical opinion since Edmunds' trial as to the cause of the
types of injuries Natalie (Beard) suffered," the three-judge panel
unanimously ruled. The Attorney
General is mulling whether to appeal the ruling.
Three
days before he was to go on
trial for the shaking death of his infant son, Andy Houser of
Manchester, Tennessee was summoned
to his lawyer's office. Andy
Houser had been a murder defendant for
nearly two years. The allegation had already cost him heavily: his
marriage dissolved, a hoped-for career in law enforcement evaporated,
numerous friends abandoned him and strangers accusingly stared at him.
And his son was dead, a victim of shaken baby syndrome, police
said. Houser knew life could get worse. In three days,
prosecutors planned to
spell out their explanation of how Ethan died at the hands of the
father. A forensic pathologist would testify that Ethan's small brain
was bruised on both sides and that clotted blood was present, a sign of
fresh injury. In addition, tiny blood vessels on the surface of the
baby's right eye had ruptured. Both are telltale signs of a shaken
baby. Defense
attorney Robert Carter handed his puzzled client a piece of paper, a
fax from the
state medical examiner's office. Near the top, in capital
letters, were three powerful words, whose
force still reverberate strongly in Coffee County: "Amended Autopsy
Report." Suspicion
adds horror to father's grief for his baby
|
State
of Florida vs. Brian Patrick Herlihy
Circuit Court of Florida, Eighth Judicial Circuit,
Alachua County
Brian Herlihy was convicted of causing the death of Baby Robert, an
infant in his care, by violently shaking the child. None of the
physicians who testified as experts for the state reviewed the baby’s
prenatal and postnatal
medical records to learn about his pre-existing health problems, his
treatment
with corticosteroid, or his adverse reactions to vaccines. some of
these physicians were aware that Baby
Robert suffered from chronic health conditions such as a chronic
subdural
bleed, brain atrophy, and sinus and ear infections. However, they did
not make
any attempt to investigate the links between the baby’s chronic
illnesses and
his respiratory arrest on the morning of August 2, 2000. The evidence
also
shows that Brian was convicted
and imprisoned due to sloppy and
incomplete medical investigations.
Click HERE
to read the report (MS Word format) of Dr. Mohammed
Al-Bayati, toxicologist and pathologist. Then decide for yourself, and
demand justice for Brian Herlihy.
|
Brian Herlihy
|
Ken Marsh
Ken Marsh spent 21 years in
California prisons for a crime that never happened. He was
convicted in 1984 of murdering 2-year-old Kenneth Buell based on
testimony of treating physicians -- with no independent corroboration
-- who were seeking to protect themselves from malpractice
claims.
His conviction
was reversed without an evidentiary hearing based on insufficiency of
the medical expert evidence.
Ken Marsh
and his attorney, Tracy Emblem, have generously made available
extensive forensic resources utilized in his case for the benefit of
other innocent people facing similar charges. Visit Free Ken Marsh
In 1999, Alan Yurko of Orlando, FL
was convicted of shaking his 10-week-old son to death and sentenced to
life without parole. But the autopsy performed by Dr. Stashio
Gore doesn't come close to minimum standard of care -- and Dr.
Gore admits to all the Bad
Science.
|
California's
2nd Appellate District Court has overturned Jose
Salazar's murder conviction in the death of Adriana Krygoski.
That
conviction was based on the testimony of LA Dep. Coroner James Ribe,
who claimed that "shaken baby" injuries -- in this instance,
intracranial bleeding -- could be accurately "timed" and therefore used
to identify the assailant. This "theory" has been discredited by
medical science. It is just one of numerous cases in which Dr.
Ribe has woven a Web
of Deceit.
|
|
Victims of Dr. Joan Wood
For
nearly a quarter century, the citizens of Florida's Pinellas and Pasco
Counties suffered with an incompetent and corrupt Medical Examiner, Dr.
Joan Wood. Some suffered more than others.
|
Little Donovan Wright’s death
was a tragedy. The tragedy was compounded by the testimony of a
medical expert who claimed he could reliably time Donovan's critical
injury to a period when the child was in the care of his father, Doug
Wright. Doug was convicted of killing his son. Now the
doctor acknowledges his testimony was faulty; he was wrong. But
he is unconcerned because he can't remember either Donovan or Doug. Forgotten by Justice
UPDATE: 4/9/07- Old Report Brings
New Hope for Doug Wright. A police accident report, withheld
from the defense at the time of Doug's trial, proves that Donovan
Wright was in a 99 mph car crash one month before his death.
Donovan did not receive medical care immediately after the crash, and
could have sustained his ultimately-fatal injuries in the wreck -- not at the hands of his father.
|
Munchhausen
Syndrome by Proxy
Another theory unsupported by objective scientific evidence
MAMA/M.A.M.A.: Munchausen Syndrome
by Proxy
What you don't know can destroy
your family, send you to prison and even cost your children their
lives.
"Mama/M.A.M.A. " is a
groundbreaking film that examines Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy, a
bizarre form of supposed child abuse in which a mother pretends her
child is ill - or actually makes her child sick- in order to get the
sympathy and praise of the medical community. The film scrutinizes the
scientific research surrounding the allegation and, in so doing,
questions the very
diagnosis itself. Visit the companion website. See the
film. Protect yourselves and your children.
Any
of the following may put a mother in the MSbP “frame”: if
the doctor can find nothing wrong with the child; if tests are
negative; if mum demands other opinions; if she has an “unhealthy”
interest in things medical; if she exaggerates the child’s condition;
and, of course, if she denies making it all up. For the health service,
MSbP is a cheap solution to difficult cases. Some doctors call it a
sexy diagnosis. Catchphrase that
Convicts Overanxious Mothers
UK:
The
cases of more than 250 parents
convicted of killing their babies are to be reviewed urgently after a
landmark Court of Appeal ruling on January 19, 2004 changed the rules
on baby
death prosecutions. The Court ruled
that in future no parent who had lost two or more
babies should be prosecuted if the case relied solely on expert
evidence that was disputed by other professionals who believed that the
death could have been caused by natural, if unexplained, causes. US Needs Similar
Review
UK:
The cot death
expert at the centre of a series of high profile cases
against women accused of killing their babies is to face a professional
conduct committee. Sir Roy Meadow invented "Munchausen by Proxy
Syndrome", a theory that has punished grieving parents and destroyed
families on both sides of the Atlantic. His pseudoscience
continues to thrive in the US, but in the UK, authorities are
questioning his Fitness
to Practise
CBS 60 Minutes II examined
just a handful of UK cases in which mothers were convicted of murdering
their children on the word of Roy
Meadow alone, without Meadow ever seeing the children or the
mothers. If you missed the segment, broadcast in April, 2004, you
need to read the summary. Expert Testimony, Bad
Evidence
Child Protection and Social Care Management Consultant Charles Pagnell
examines Fabricated and/or Induced Illness in Children (popularized by
Sir Roy Meadow as "Munchausen by Proxy Syndrome") and finds the Theoretical Basis is
Unsound
|
Unfounded
Physical/Mental Abuse Allegations
On
Wednesday, Aug. 13, 2008, exactly four years after officials with
the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services raided the
primitive therapeutic camp in Smithville known as Woodside Trails and
removed nearly 40 boys, camp administrator Betty Lou "Bebe" Gaines
settled a federal lawsuit against nine DFPS employees. In her suit,
Gaines charged the officials had deprived her of due process rights in
branding her neglectful of her wards, closing the camp, and effectively
ending her career. Vindication.
Madison
County, Mississippi officials have dropped murder charges against
Hattie Douglas in connection with the death of her son Kadarrius.
Initial
test results showed that Douglas' son had an alcohol
level of 0.4 percent when he died May 11, 2006. But an independent
pathologist's report said tests came back with conflicting results. The
independent pathologist ruled the child died of
pneumonia. A doctor
prescribed an iron supplement for Kadarrius, which contained a small
percentage of alcohol. Hattie still faces
a battle to get her four other children back.
After nearly two years of hell
following the tragic death of their 14-year-old daughter, the criminal
cases against Lynnette and Roman Finnegan of Franceville, IN have been
dropped. Charges
Dismissed
Lynnette and Roman Finnegan thought
the worst was
over when they buried their little girl. But at a time when the family
tried to pull together, it was torn apart by criminal charges. Bout with legal system
breaks family's hearts.
But how much
damage can be caused when a teenager dies because of medical
malpractice, an incompetent forensic pathologist can't tell the
difference between pre-mortem injuries and artifacts of autopsy, and a
"child protection" system marches on in its destruction of the family,
in blind disregard of the findings that the death was caused by medical
malpractice? Roman and Lynette Finnegan know, and they tell us, In Their Own Words. |
Twelve-year-old J. Daniel
Scruggs of Meriden, Connecticut was bullied so relentlessly at school
that the Conn. Dept. of Children and Families, after inspecting his
home, suggested his mother keep him out of school until a transfer
could be arranged. A few days later, the boy hanged himself in
his closet. Then the local prosecutor charged his grieving
mother, Judith Scruggs, with keeping such a dirty house that it
prompted the boy to commit suicide. A jury agreed and convicted
Scruggs of causing her child's suicide. The Connecticut Supreme
Court has overturned her conviction -- So Little, So Late.
The
Darke County, Ohio prosecutor has said
he is closing the homicide investigation into the death of 5-year-old
Daniel Crow Jr. because a rare genetic disease may be the cause of the
boy's death, not abuse. It's too late for the rest of the
family.
Their other children were seized by the state and adopted by other
families. Officially
Sanctioned Abuse
At
first, Verlie Hicks of Peoria, Illinois was frightened and confused
when she was
arrested, held naked in a mental health unit at the Peoria County Jail
because she refused to remove braids from her hair, and falsely accused
of burning a baby in her care with cigarettes. Now she's angry and is
looking for a lawyer. Guilty Until
Proven Innocent
|
Through the prism of a defamation suit, a federal judge in
Atlanta has examined the 1996 murder case of 6-year-old Colorado beauty
queen JonBenét Ramsey and determined there is "virtually no
evidence" to support theories that her parents killed her. U.S.
District Judge
Julie E. Carnes, a former federal prosecutor, evaluated
evidence that the Ramseys, Patsy Ramsey in particular, were responsible
for their daughter's slaying. In her analysis, Carnes sharply
criticized the botched investigation that followed the discovery of
JonBenét's body; accused Boulder police of using the media to
target the Ramseys; and stated that the Ramseys, despite widespread
criticism to the contrary, attempted to cooperate fully with detectives
investigating their daughter's murder.
 Five years after Judge Carnes
figured it out, two years after Patsy Ramsey died, Boulder
County, CO DA Mary Lacy has cleared JonBenét
Ramsey's parents and brother of any involvement in her death. "No
innocent person should have to endure such an extensive trial in the
court of public opinion," she told John Ramsey. "Touch DNA" makes it
official.
|
False
Allegations of Sexual Abuse
Imagine
this scenario: Your employer gives you a laptop computer that is a
ticking time
bomb full of child porn, and then you get fired, and then you get
prosecuted as some kind of freak. That's what happened to
Massachusetts state employee Michael Fiola. Now defense and
prosecution computer experts agree that
the laptop was running corrupted virus-protection software,
and Fiola was hit by spammers and crackers bombarding its memory with
images of incest and pre-teen porn not visible to the naked eye. It was a bum rap.
Since Fiola's employer, the Massachusetts Department of Industrial
Accidents (DIA), provided him with the infected laptop in the first
place, you'd expect an apology and an offer of reinstatement,
right? Wrong! The DIA stands by the
wrongs it has committed against Fiola.
Just when you think you've seen it all ...
Ted White of Lee's Summit, MO served 5 years of a 50-year sentence
after he was falsely convicted of sexually molesting his
step-daughter. His conviction was overturned in 2005, and he was
acquitted at re-trial. Lee's Summit police detective Richard
McKinley, who was having an affair with White's then-wife, Tina, framed
White on false charges to get rid of him. Tina subsequently
married McKinley, and Ted White is suing them both. The U.S.
Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit has ruled that White has a right to sue.
It started with a phone call from CPS,
telling North Texas home builder Douglas Buchar that his 12-year-old
adopted daughter had accused him of sexually assaulting him. Over
the next two years, his wife was also charged, although the charges
were dismissed, and the couple lost their business, their home and
their two biological children. A jury has found him not guilty of
the sexual assault charge. But getting his kids back
is a separate, uphill battle.
Brooklyn,
NY school custodian Francis Evelyn once walked proud, worked hard
and looked forward to a peaceful retirement.
Now he's too scared to go out his front door.
Five months after his face was broadcast worldwide as an accused child
rapist, Evelyn, 58, can't sleep. He can't stop the tears. He can't wipe
away the nightmare of being arrested, jailed and wrongly accused.
Custodian
falsely accused of child rape sues for $10 Million.
The nightmare began for Rodger Jones of
Orlando, Florida in August of 2004, when his youngest daughter accused
him of molesting her, a charge Jones absolutely and unequivocally
denies. His first trial ended in a hung jury. Jones was
convicted at his second trial in 2005, a conviction that the Fifth
District Court of Appeals concluded rested on claims that Jones
committed more serious offenses in another jurisdiction -- claims that
were never charged, much less proven. When the Court of Appeals
reversed Jones' conviction, the Orange County judge continued to refuse
to allow Jones' release from prison. The Court of Appeals had to
order his release.
Jones, who is awaiting his third
trial on the same charges, tells us: "I am 54 years old and must
have been sleeping all those years not to realize that the trial courts
and the prosecutors in this country are so corrupt only looking for the
conviction and not the truth. The people of this country need to be
told about the state of affairs in the judicial system in this country.
Until this happened to me I thought that this country was a very good
country to live in. The people of this country need to vote to change
the system back to what our founding fathers wanted. Without the
knowledge of the broken system though people will not know to make the
changes."
Click HERE to
read the Court of Appeals decision.
Elizabeth
Golebiewski was 23 in 1983 when a Lucas County (Ohio) Common
Pleas Court jury convicted the North Toledo woman of using a toy gun to
sexually assault her daughter and then killing her. A
convicted thief testified at trial that Elizabeth
had confessed to her during conversations in jail that she
had killed the child, offering grisly details that authorities contend
only investigators and the killer would have been aware of at the
time. Elizabeth's request for DNA testing of the toy gun and
other
evidence has been granted. And, while it is a long shot, DNA
tissue from someone other than the mother or child might just be enough
to prompt a judge to review the 1983 conviction. Hard Won Long Shot
It took egregious misconduct by both
police and prosecutors to hold
together a case against teacher James Perry long enough for a jury to
convict him of molesting 2 kindergarteners in suburban Detroit's
Oakland County. Well, it was either deliberate misconduct or
these
folks really believe that "Harry Potter" and "The Lion King" are
"nonerotic pornography." If you need your hair curled, read the
following news reports:
In
Bakersfield, CA, Kern County DA Ed
Jagels put two dozen innocent people behind bars on charges that they
molested their own kids -- while ignoring evidence that his friends
were throwing orgies with teenage boys. So why is one of America's most
reckless prosecutors still in power? Mean Justice's
Dirty Secrets
Before national
attention brought
a halt to the worst witch hunt in U.S. history, 43 adults were falsely
arrested
on 29,726 fabricated charges of child sex abuse involving 60 children.
Parents,
Sunday school teachers and a local pastor were indicted and many were
convicted
of raping their own children and the children of other members of a sex
ring.
Innocent people were railroaded into prison, and their children were
sold
into foster care. Conservative Columnist Paul Craig Roberts
details How a
Mantra Ate Justice
Nancy
Smith and Joseph Allen were convicted of sexually abusing young
children in August of 1994. Smith, a 37-year-old single mother
with four children, was a bus driver for the Lorain, Ohio Head Start.
The prosecution charged that after delivering the children to
school, she would sometimes keep three or four of them and take them to
a mysterious location, where she and a man known to the children only
as "Joseph" would commit various sexual acts with them, make
them drink urine, and poke them with needles and sticks. But an
examination of the police investigation leaves many disturbing
questions; questions about the children's testimony, questions about
whether Smith and Allen even knew each other -- questions about
whether, in fact, any crimes were committed at all. Imaginary Crimes
UPDATE: 2/22/07 - Nancy
Smith’s bid for freedom Tuesday was rejected for a number of reasons,
including a parole board official’s opinion that she hadn’t served
enough time after being convicted of molesting children while she was a
Head Start bus driver in the 1990s. They Want a
Confession to Crimes She did not Commit
When
he was convicted in 1985 of
raping five children, Bernard Baran of Pittsfield, MA joined the ranks
of a new kind of
criminal gripping the nation's attention: a child molester who used his
job at a daycare to prey on his victims. Two
decades after he began serving three life sentences, a Superior
Court judge has ruled that Baran should receive a new trial, and his
supporters are hopeful that he will be cleared of any wrongdoing.
Hoping to
Prove His Innocence
|
Cases to Consider
This
is a very disturbing case that may give ammunition to those
who fear that juvenile courts, where there is less
advocacy, less investigation, less use of DNA testing, and great
pressure
to plea bargain, may be a breeding ground for wrongful convictions,
particularly false confessions and false guilty pleas.
|
John Michael Harvey
Eleven years into a
40 year sentence, John's innocence is finally being examined.
A
Harris County,
Texas prosecutor says faulty physical exams performed by a former nurse
may have resulted in wrongful conviction of some defendants in child
sex abuse cases. 170 Potential
Wrongful Convictions
For James
Rodriguez, the only way to freedom
was to confess to sex crimes he — and one of his alleged victims — says
he did not commit. Predator or Prey?
San
Joaquin County, California Superior Court Judge Stephen Demetras
ordered the release of 36-year-old Peter Rose after 10 years of
incarceration. Convicted of sexually assaulting a 13 year-old
Lodi
girl in 1994, Rose was sentenced to 27 years in prison. With no
history of violent crime or sexual assault, Rose has maintained his
innocence from the beginning. DNA testing has proved him
right. It
has also shown the tragic results when police browbeat a child into
accusing the person they have already decided is guilty.
Sylvester's case is yet another
example of how pressuring children to make false allegations leads to
wrongful convictions. In 1984, two young girls were molested by
their cousin who was also a juvenile. Their grandmother, thinking
the cousin would be sent to prison, convinced the girls to accuse
Sylvester Smith instead. Now grown, the victims have recanted and
are supported by the trial testimony of one of them -- she told the
defense attorney her grandmother said to accuse Smith.
A
couple who
became fugitives in 1984 following accusations that they abused their
4-year-old daughter left jail feeling vindicated after prosecutors
dropped the charges, but said their lives had been ruined. Edward
and Karri LaBois fled Minnesota with
their daughter 19 years ago after the abuse accusation was made. They
were arrested in 2003 when an informant tipped police that they were
living in a Salt Lake City suburb. Sex
Abuse Witch Hunt Scam
|
Link:
 Did Daddy
Do It?
New Evidence
Calls an "Ironclad" Conviction into Question
Link:
Defense
of Child Molestation Charges
by Joel Erik Thompson, Esq.
LINK:
A
WGBH Forum Network Lecture
- Remembering
Trauma
Richard
J. McNally, professor, psychology, Harvard
Belle
Adler, professor, Northeastern School of Journalism
Are
horrific experiences indelibly fixed in a victim's memory? Or does the
mind protect itself by banishing traumatic memories from consciousness?
How victims remember trauma is the most controversial issue in
psychology today, spilling out of consulting rooms and laboratories to
capture headlines, rupture families, provoke legislative change, and
influence criminal trials and civil suits. A clinician and laboratory
researcher, Richard McNally challenges the ready acceptance of a notion
he says goes beyond common sense. He contends that traumatic
experiences are indeed unforgettable and the evidence for repressed
memories is surprisingly weak.
|
Link:
Witch Hunt
A
comprehensive listing of cases involving false claims of child abuse,
ritual abuse, and false memories, as well as resources and information
on these subjects. |
Re-examining the Process
| Michael
G. Brock, MA, LLP, CSW is licensed as both a master’s level
psychologist and a certified social worker. He is in private practice
at Counseling and Evaluation Services in Wyandotte, MI. Brock has been
in the therapy field since 1974 and, in the past five years, custody
evaluations have become the majority of his practice. Brock has done
over 200 evaluations. Brock re-examines how the criminal justice
system balances---or fails
to balance---the interests of truth and justice with those of child
protection. |
In November, 2003, Pennsylvania voters
voted
to deny criminal
defendants the right to confront their accusers in court. They
probably felt there would be no cost to themselves.
But if we let witnesses avoid accountability in criminal proceedings,
we all will pay a high price, eventually. No Accountability
Identifying False Allegations
| False
reports of crime, including but not limited to sexual assault, put
innocent
people on trial or in prison andexact a high toll in money, resources
and human suffering. Det. John Baeza, NYPD (Ret.) is an expert
whose private consulting practice focuses on sex crimes,
homicides,
child abuse and premises liability. His Special-Victims website
offers extensive information on false reports at the links below: |
Back to Top
More
Resources
In Plano, Texas
False
Memory/Recovered
Memory
Recommended
Reading from Stop Bad Therapy
|
