A temporarily unemployed
Norwalk, Conn., man, attempting to collect $26,468 for personal property
he lost in a basement fire, won a verdict for half a million dollars in
emotional distress damages against Allstate despite or because of the insurer's
fierce defense.
Allstate, based in
Northbrook, Ill., chose to fight back against Oswald Carrol's bad-faith
claim, after it had paid his wife about $100,000 on the $244,800 policy.
It counterclaimed that Carrol actually set the 1997 fire, misrepresented
facts about the loss, and concealed important facts from investigators.
After four days of
trial, a Stamford, Conn., jury concluded that Allstate miscalculated and
was liable for $500,000 in damages for intentional and negligent infliction
of emotional distress, due to its continuing suspicion and extensive questioning
of Carrol.
Both sides agree
that the fire at Oswald and Violet Carrol's home spread from a blue metal
kerosene container. Carrol's story was that he had it filled at a local
gas station to fuel a kerosene heater, and that the attendant evidently
filled it with gasoline. It smelled odd to the Carrols, says his trial
lawyer, Frederick Ury, of Westport, Conn.'s Ury & Moskow. They left
the fuel near a bulkhead door in the basement overnight.
The next day, after
Violet had gone to work, Oswald heard a loud boom around 11 a.m., smelled
smoke and found the can in flames. He attempted to put it out with a jacket,
but failing to do so, hurled the container out of the basement doorway,
then ran to a neighbor's and called the fire department, which arrived
quickly.
The case unfolded
on two levels, with the fire experts battling over facts, and the jury
attempting to decide whether Carrol was a good person who'd had a bad experience,
or an arsonist attempting to deceive Allstate, the court, and the jury
itself.
Ury, in an interview,
said he believed that Allstate's investigators quickly "made an assessment"
against Carrol when they learned he had lost his job with a parcel delivery
service due to a dispute with a client, and that he was unemployed. Carrol
was intensively questioned, and Allstate seized on the fact that Carrol
did not disclose prior credit card debt.
But Ury recounted
arguments that weighed in favor of it being an accident. The Carrols' mortgage
was paid up, Mrs. Carrol was employed, nothing was missing from the house,
it was in "immaculate" condition, and the fire occurred during the day.
Furthermore, Mr. Carrol's prompt and effective efforts to stop the fire
seemed inconsistent with arson, Ury noted.
The plaintiff's expert
witness, former New York City fire marshal John Barracato, theorized that
the cap of the kerosene can was loose, and that fumes from the can were
ignited by the pilot light of a basement stove.
"He could show you
the [burn] line right on the stove, right down the sink, right to the fuel
load. The reason the fumes were above the floor -- usually gasoline fumes
sink, because they are heavier than air -- is because the bulkhead door
was leaking cold air, and blew the fumes," Ury said.
Allstate witness
Thomas Haynes testified that the fuel appeared to be spread around the
floor, as if the fire were intentionally set.
Ury tried the case
with Betty Ann Rogers. Daniel F. Sullivan, of Hartford's Robinson &
Cole, represented Allstate.
In Ury's view, the
jury's decision boiled down to a matter of weighing Mr. Carrol's demeanor
and character on the witness stand.
Allstate contended
that Mr. Carrol had not fulfilled his obligations under the terms of the
insurance contract because he had not completely disclosed his credit card
debt. Ury was quick to point out in his questioning of Mr. Carrol that
the insurance policy was subject to negotiation on such terms.
The jury, in a seven-step
series of decisions, first concluded that Allstate failed to prove that
Mr. Carrol misrepresented and concealed material facts, or that the fire
was set by intentional or criminal acts. With that finding, a $26,468 personal
property damage award was automatic.
Next came the issues
of negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress, which the
jurors found Mr. Carrol proved, awarding $500,000.
Finally, the panel
found that Allstate had not breached a duty of good faith and fair dealing,
but on the basis of its finding of emotional distress liability, awarded
the $60,000 in punitive damages that both sides had pre-stipulated, based
on the level of attorneys' fees.
Allstate intends
to appeal, Sullivan reports. |