
DNA Evidence Claim
Clouds Australian Convictions
Annabelle McDonald
July 08, 2006, © The Australian
ABOUT 60 convicted criminals could have their cases reopened amid
claims the DNA evidence used to incriminate them was unreliable.
Ron Grice, a former Queensland Health Scientific Services scientist,
said he was haunted by memories of submitting potentially unreliable
DNA evidence to the courts. He believed about 5 per cent of the 1200
cases he had handled relied on samples too small to be retested.
Mr Grice yesterday attacked the culture of the QHSS, saying it was not
uncommon for he and his colleagues to mix up DNA samples belonging to
different cases. Despite the existence of internal errors, he said,
QHSS encouraged him to record DNA test results to be used by the
courts, even if the samples were too small to be retested.
"When I was at the John Tong centre, quite often we used to put our own
blood as controllers and quite often my (colleague) would walk down the
aisle and say, 'I've just committed another rape at the Gold Coast',"
Mr Grice told a DNA forum at Griffith University on the Gold Coast
yesterday.
"If you can't resample and you can't retest, you say an internal error
might have occurred and we can't possibly send this bloke to jail. Time
and again, our samples are so small they could not possible be retested
- I used to do it myself and it still gives me nightmares when I lie in
bed.”
"You'd go off to court and argue yes, you found an incriminating bit of
DNA on a particular item, when really you couldn't resample the item
and you didn't even have enough samples to retest."
Mr Grice said he tested about 120 cases a year, of which he feared
about 5 per cent relied on samples that were too small to be retested.
Despite his concerns, he did not voice them in court, partly because
defence lawyers did not have enough forensic knowledge to ask about the
testing procedure, and partly because QHSS wanted results, even if the
samples could not be retested.
Police Commissioner Bob Atkinson yesterday defended the practices of
the state's forensic scientists but said cases documented by Mr Grice
should be re-examined.
A forensic sciences spokeswoman at QHSS yesterday confirmed that it
continued to supply DNA test results to the courts, even if the samples
were too small to be retested. But she said processes were in place to
prevent miscarriages of justice.
|